Lost a Government Bid?
Find Out What the Record Says.
You know who won. The harder question is why.
FOIA Experts reconstructs completed government procurements using available pricing, evaluation records, evaluator findings, award materials, proposals where releasable, contracts, and related public records to help you understand how the winning firm prevailed.
Source-backed research. Clear limitations. No unsupported conclusions.
Winning and losing rarely comes down to one number.
A bid result tells you who received the award. It does not necessarily tell you what happened inside the evaluation.
The useful post-award questions are often more specific:
We look beyond the award notice.
Depending on the procurement, jurisdiction, and records available for release, useful evidence may include:
Evaluation Scores
Individual or consensus scoring, weighted criteria, rankings, and score differences between bidders.
Evaluator Findings
Documented strengths, weaknesses, concerns, deficiencies, and differentiators where available and releasable.
Pricing
Bid tabulations, pricing schedules, unit rates, bidder pricing, evaluated price, and final contract pricing where available.
Winning Proposal
Technical approach, staffing, schedule, scope, commitments, and other proposal features where proposal material is releasable.
Award Materials
Award recommendations, board materials, evaluation summaries, bid results, and other records documenting the procurement decision.
Contract Context
Executed contracts, amendments, change orders, renewal options, rate adjustments, purchase orders, and actual spending where relevant.
Records are evidence.
The objective is the answer.
FOIA Experts' Competitive Intelligence service is built around the business question, not merely the document request.
We review the available public record, identify material gaps, pursue targeted records where appropriate, compare the evidence, and prepare a concise source-backed analysis.
A typical analysis may address:
- How the winning firm prevailed based on the available record
- Pricing and evaluation comparisons
- Evaluator-documented strengths and weaknesses
- Winning-proposal findings where releasable
- Relevant contract, amendment, or spending context
- Material gaps, redactions, and withheld information
- What the available record does — and does not — establish
We distinguish what the record shows from what it does not.
A lower price does not automatically mean price caused the award. A scoring difference does not necessarily explain why evaluators reached that result. And missing or redacted records can materially limit what can be concluded.
FOIA Experts separates documented findings from analytical observations and identifies conclusions that are not established by the available records.
The available record directly supports the statement.
A reasonable interpretation supported by the available evidence.
The evidence does not support the requested conclusion.
From lost bid to evidence-backed findings.
Identify the Procurement
Provide the agency, solicitation or RFP number, award notice, contract number, or other information you have.
Define the Question
We clarify what you want to understand about the award and define the scope of the engagement.
Build the Evidence
We review official public sources and identify targeted public-records requests needed to fill material gaps.
Analyze the Award
We compare the available pricing, scoring, evaluator findings, proposal features, and contract evidence relevant to the question.
Deliver the Findings
You receive a concise, source-backed intelligence brief with the supporting evidence organized for review.
State, local, and federal procurements are not the same.
State and local procurement records may include proposals, evaluation materials, score sheets, pricing, award recommendations, contracts, and related records, subject to the applicable public-records law and exemptions.
Federal procurement requires a different records strategy because federal law restricts disclosure of contractor proposals and certain source-selection information. Federal engagements therefore focus on records that are lawfully releasable, such as contract, modification, pricing, justification, spending, and other available procurement evidence.
We do not promise access to records an agency may lawfully withhold.
Post-award intelligence questions
Can you tell me exactly why we lost?
We can analyze what the available procurement record establishes about the award. In some cases, evaluation records provide a clear explanation. In others, records may be incomplete, redacted, withheld, or insufficient to establish a single cause. Those limitations are stated plainly.
Can you get the winning proposal?
Sometimes. Availability depends on the jurisdiction, procurement, and applicable exemptions. State and local proposal records may be available in circumstances where comparable federal contractor proposals are not.
Can you compare our pricing with the winner?
Where reliable pricing records are available, we can compare evaluated prices, bid schedules, unit rates, or other relevant pricing evidence. Pricing is normalized where necessary so the comparison is meaningful.
Can you review evaluator comments and scores?
Where those records are available and releasable, yes. We can compare scoring by criterion and summarize documented strengths, weaknesses, concerns, deficiencies, and differentiators.
Is this a bid protest service?
No. FOIA Experts provides public-records research and competitive intelligence. We do not provide legal advice or bid-protest representation.
Is my research confidential?
Yes. Client identity, research objectives, materials, engagement information, and request history are treated as confidential client information. FOIA Experts submits public-records requests in its own name and does not identify the underlying client to the records agency as part of the request process.
You already know who won.
Now find out what the record says.
Start with the agency, solicitation, award, or competitor you want to understand.
Start Your Competitive Intelligence Report